Some politicians predict long-term solution will be a ‘managed retreat’ from state’s coastal communities

By Jim Carroll

With not much state or federal assistance available, Florida communities have been left to pay most of the costs to defend their towns from the damage caused by sea-level rise.
Most communities can’t afford it. This puts their elected officials in a tough spot.   

Mind-blowing costs
A sampling of what Florida communities need to spend to protect against sea-level rise: 
• $378 million for Delray Beach (pop. 65,000), to raise roads, build/elevate seawalls, and upgrade other infrastructure (city’s entire annual budget: $225 million).  
 • $75 million for South Miami (pop. 13,000), to replace flood-susceptible septic tanks with a municipal sewer system (city’s entire annual budget: $19 million). 
• $1.8 billion for Monroe County, to raise roads and relocate utilities (county’s entire annual budget: $460 million).
 These are the costs today. As Boynton Beach’s sustainability coordinator, Rebecca Harvey, said about sea-level rise expenditures, “You can spend a dollar now — or $6 later.” 

Telling unpleasant truth
 Elected officials have to tell constituents the truth about the cost and affordability of actions to confront sea-level rise. Not easy.
 Philip Stoddard, former mayor of South Miami, observed, “Few political leaders are prepared to tell people the truth.  … We don’t have the means to finance the infrastructure that would be needed to adapt the area to the sea-level rise of the coming decades.”
 Most communities don’t have the money to adapt to sea-level rise. A number of them have tried to raise the money, but many voters have resisted. 
 In Highland Beach (pop. 3,885), commissioners in 2019 proposed that the town spend $45 million on improvements along A1A to largely help protect against rising seas.  The town’s entire annual budget is $17 million.
Town residents responded with personal verbal attacks and complaints, especially at Town Commission meetings.
In the three referenda on the proposed expenditures, they voted about 94% to 6% against them.  Thereafter the mayor and vice mayor left office and the mayor was replaced by a leader of the opposition.

Better to retreat?
Lacking the necessary funds and facing a possible Highland Beach situation if they try to raise the money, some local officials feel stuck. Some are starting to resign themselves to a policy of “managed retreat” from threatened areas.
 In South Miami, “a small city with 13,000 people, it would cost $75 million to replace the defective septic tanks with a municipal sewer system,” Stoddard said. “We need to tell people it’s time to think about retreat while there’s still time to do it calmly.” 
 Many homes in Surfside (pop. 5,725) are at risk from rising seas. The town doesn’t have the money to save them. In 2019, then-Mayor Daniel Dietch and the Town Commission prepared a detailed climate crisis action plan, including a “resilience fund.” That money is not for saving homes. Rather, Dietch said, it’s “a euphemism for planned relocation” — managed retreat.  
 “Retreat is that word nobody likes to use,” said Monroe County Administrator Roman Gastesi, even though “we’re going to have to retreat from some areas.”  
Jim Cason, a former three-term mayor of Coral Gables, concurs. Retreat is “inevitable,” he said.

Stopgap measures
If you’re an elected official and you don’t want to have your head handed to you while trying to raise money, but you also don’t want to consign your community’s vulnerable areas to managed retreat, you can profess optimism and implement cheaper, essentially stopgap measures.  
Of course, stopgap measures will leave you in the same place as doing nothing — wet. It just may take a little longer. 
As Cason said about stopgap measures he helped implement in Coral Gables, “We’re working hard to create solutions until we inevitably must retreat.”

Not enough aid from state
Beleaguered local officials have not been able to turn to the state for meaningful funding.  Gov. Ron DeSantis and the legislature are trying to create the impression that they care about the cost of combating sea-level rise. They’re not succeeding.  
On Jan. 22, the governor stood in front of a pretty backdrop in Key Largo and announced grants totaling $10.4 million to Monroe County to fight rising seas. The county needs $1.8 billion with a “b,” according to the County Commission. 
 In this time of climate crisis, serving as an elected official in coastal Florida is no walk in the park.

8627960098?profile=RESIZE_180x180Jim Carroll is a Riviera Beach attorney and environmental activist, and was a candidate for the Florida House of Representatives in 2020.

 8627963261?profile=RESIZE_192X“The Invading Sea” is the opinion arm of the Florida Climate Reporting Network, a collaborative of news organizations across the state focusing on the threats posed by the warming climate.

You need to be a member of The Coastal Star to add comments!

Join The Coastal Star

Email me when people reply –


  • Jim- you're not being fair!  You also need a bit of fact checking.  The $45 million proposal included $30 million for walkways, crosswalks and "pocket parks" and other nonsense that was not wanted or needed.   It was headlined as a climate change was no such thing. 

    You're article presents a dark vision of the future. Perhaps that creates increased opportunity and revenue for your business.   At the same time, the price of waterfront property is skyrocketing - so I guess not everyone is buying in to your Nostradamus predictions of ruin.  

  • The "truth" is most of the people who are being asked to fund this infrasturre of the future will not be around to derive its benefit.  There will be no noticable sea level rise (but for the ocassional seasonal flood) in the next 20 years.  I am not a climate denier just not an alarmist.  It is rising at about 1 inch every 10 years.  I the last 100 years it rose 8 inches. We understand this can PERIODICALLY overhwhelm drainage systems but, frankly, the costs otweight not worth the beneifts of those being asked to pay for them.

This reply was deleted.